← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Fossil vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Fossil stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Fossil stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Fossil stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Filter stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Fossil stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Fossil stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Fossil stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Fossil — Blade length: 88.8 mm (3.50 in)CRKT Fossil — Overall length: 195.3 mm (7.69 in)CRKT Fossil — Closed length: 109.5 mm (4.31 in)CRKT Fossil — Blade thickness: 3.7 mm (0.15 in)CRKT Fossil — Weight: 119.05 g (4.20 oz)CRKT Fossil — Retail price: US$34Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$34Cheapest
US$41.99Most expensive
Weight
119.05 g (4.20 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
88.8 mm (3.50 in)Longest
83 mm (3.27 in)Shortest
Overall length
195.3 mm (7.69 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
109.5 mm (4.31 in)Shortest
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.7 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
2Cr13 Stainless Steel with G10 overlays
Stainless steel
Finish
Satin
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Flipper and thumb hole
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
Removable pocket clip, tip-up carry
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣EDC▣General Purpose Folding Knife
▣Everyday Carry▣Work
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Fast And Smooth Opening✓Comfortable And Secure Grip✓Strong Solid Frame Lock✓Attractive Satin Finish Blade✓Good Value For Price
✓Well Balanced And Solid Frame Lock Action✓Comfortable Stainless Steel Handle With Smooth Contouring✓Protective Blackwash Coating Hides Wear And Resists Scratches✓Fast And Easy One Handed Assisted Opening Via Flipper And Thumb Stud
Common complaints
⚠No Option To Switch Pocket Clip Side⚠Handle May Feel Bulky For Small Hands
⚠None Clearly Documented In Provided Sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online