← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Heiho Deadbolt stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt stands out as the shortest option for blade length.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Blade length: 79.4 mm (3.13 in)CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Overall length: 178 mm (7.01 in)CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Blade thickness: 3.1 mm (0.12 in)CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)CRKT Heiho Deadbolt — Retail price: US$40Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$40Cheapest
US$43.99Most expensive
Weight
102 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
79.4 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
178 mm (7.01 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.1 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr14MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Satin
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Outburst assisted opening with thumb disk
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Reversible tip-up pocket clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carrySelf-defenseTactical useQuick deployment
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
!Heavy chopping!Fixed blade tasks
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted openingSolid liner lock with effective manual LAWKS safetySharp out of the boxGood ambidextrous ergonomicsReversible deep carry clip
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Handle scales can be slipperyGrip confidence is reduced by smooth G10 finish
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online