Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Cheapest
Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.
Most expensive
CRKT HVAS stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.
Lightest
Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Heaviest
CRKT HVAS stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
CRKT HVAS stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.
Shortest
CRKT HVAS stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.
Longest
Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 45% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
✓Easy Maintenance With Field Strip Technology✓Smooth Action And Good Blade Design✓Lightweight And Durable Glass Reinforced Nylon Handle✓Secure Liner Lock Mechanism
✓Fast And Smooth Assisted Opening Action✓Secure, Comfortable Grip With Textured Handle✓Lightweight And Well Balanced✓Affordable Price Point
Common complaints
⚠Handle Has Multiple Hot Spots And Can Feel Cheap⚠Pocket Clip And Scale Edges May Cause Discomfort⚠Considered A Good Limited Use Knife But Not Great Value