← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT MinimalX vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT MinimalX stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 48% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT MinimalX stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT MinimalX stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 48% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 94% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT MinimalX stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT MinimalX stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 49% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT MinimalX — Blade length: 55.58 mm (2.19 in)CRKT MinimalX — Overall length: 134.54 mm (5.30 in)CRKT MinimalX — Closed length: 79.22 mm (3.12 in)CRKT MinimalX — Blade thickness: 3.2 mm (0.13 in)CRKT MinimalX — Weight: 73.71 g (2.60 oz)CRKT MinimalX — Retail price: US$60Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$60Most expensive
US$41.99Cheapest
Weight
73.71 g (2.60 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
55.58 mm (2.19 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
134.54 mm (5.30 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
79.22 mm (3.12 in)Shortest
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.2 mm (0.13 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
12C27
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
Stainless steel
Finish
Brush / Satin
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Frame Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Flipper
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
Deep Carry
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣Precision Tasks▣Durable EDC Use
▣Everyday Carry▣Work
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Compact And Strong Design✓Smooth Flipper Opening With Ikbs Bearings✓Durable Stainless Steel Handle And Blade✓Deep Carry Pocket Clip For Discreet Carry
✓Well Balanced And Solid Frame Lock Action✓Comfortable Stainless Steel Handle With Smooth Contouring✓Protective Blackwash Coating Hides Wear And Resists Scratches✓Fast And Easy One Handed Assisted Opening Via Flipper And Thumb Stud
Common complaints
⚠No Assisted Opening⚠Small Blade Size May Not Suit All Tasks
⚠None Clearly Documented In Provided Sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online