← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken vs Kershaw Chive

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 74% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Chive stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 74% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 278% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 86% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 142% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Blade length: 116 mm (4.57 in)CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Overall length: 257 mm (10.12 in)CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Closed length: 138 mm (5.43 in)CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Blade thickness: 4 mm (0.16 in)CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Weight: 181.44 g (6.40 oz)CRKT Otanashi Noh Ken — Retail price: US$113Kershaw Chive — Blade length: 48 mm (1.89 in)Kershaw Chive — Overall length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Kershaw Chive — Closed length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Chive — Blade thickness: 2.3 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Chive — Weight: 48 g (1.69 oz)Kershaw Chive — Retail price: US$109.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$113Most expensive
US$109.99Cheapest
Weight
181.44 g (6.40 oz)Heaviest
48 g (1.69 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
116 mm (4.57 in)Longest
48 mm (1.89 in)Shortest
Overall length
257 mm (10.12 in)Longest
122 mm (4.80 in)Shortest
Closed length
138 mm (5.43 in)Longest
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
AUS-8
420HC stainless steel (also available in Damascus steel)
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
410 stainless steel
Finish
Dark coating
Bead-blasted finish
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
Tip-up pocket clip
Single-position steel pocket clip, tip-down carry
Use case profile
Best for
Tactical useEveryday carryCombatMartial arts practitioners
Everyday carrySmall utility cutting tasksPocket carry
Not best for
!Left-handed users (clip right hand only)
!Heavy chopping tasks!Tactical use requiring larger blade
Common praise
Solid lock-upWell ground bevelSlim profile for a large pocket knifeGood qualityPositive customer reviews and ratings
Compact and lightweightDurable steel and handleQuick assisted openingReliable frame lockGreat for everyday carry
Common complaints
Pocket clip right-hand only
Small blade limits use to light tasksNot intended for heavy duty cutting

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online