← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact vs Kershaw Clash

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Clash stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 42% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade length: 54.05 mm (2.13 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Overall length: 133.35 mm (5.25 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade thickness: 2.79 mm (0.11 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Weight: 92.68 g (3.27 oz)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Retail price: US$45Kershaw Clash — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Clash — Overall length: 190 mm (7.48 in)Kershaw Clash — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Kershaw Clash — Weight: 122 g (4.30 oz)Kershaw Clash — Retail price: US$48Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45Cheapest
US$48Most expensive
Weight
92.68 g (3.27 oz)Lightest
122 g (4.30 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
54.05 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
Overall length
133.35 mm (5.25 in)Shortest
190 mm (7.48 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
108 mm (4.25 in)
Blade thickness
2.79 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
Glass-filled nylon
Finish
Black Stonewash
Black-oxide coating on blade
Lock type
Frame Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
Stainless Steel pocket clip (Right - Tip Up)
Reversible pocketclip (right, tip-up/down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry
Everyday carryUtility tasksLight outdoor use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Compact sizeSolid feel in-handGood grip due to deep finger choil and thumb friction groovesVersatile for slicing, shaving, chopping, and paring
Good edge holdingComfortable gripVersatile partial serrationsAffordableReliable assisted opening
Common complaints
Unknown
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online