← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact vs Kershaw Endgame 2095

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 111% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade length: 54.05 mm (2.13 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Overall length: 133.35 mm (5.25 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade thickness: 2.79 mm (0.11 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Weight: 92.68 g (3.27 oz)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Retail price: US$45Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Overall length: 191 mm (7.52 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Weight: 110 g (3.88 oz)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Retail price: US$95.03Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45Cheapest
US$95.03Most expensive
Weight
92.68 g (3.27 oz)Lightest
110 g (3.88 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
54.05 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
133.35 mm (5.25 in)Shortest
191 mm (7.52 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
108 mm (4.25 in)
Blade thickness
2.79 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
D2 Tool Steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
Steel handle with bronze PVD-coated and glass-filled nylon overlays
Finish
Black Stonewash
Stonewashed finish
Lock type
Frame Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Flipper
Manual flipper with KVT ball bearing system
Clip type
Stainless Steel pocket clip (Right - Tip Up)
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip (tip-up)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry
Everyday carryWorkCollection
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Compact sizeSolid feel in-handGood grip due to deep finger choil and thumb friction groovesVersatile for slicing, shaving, chopping, and paring
High edge retention and wear resistance due to D2 tool steelSmooth opening action with KVT ball bearingsMulti-layered and unique handle designReversible deep-carry pocketclip for convenient carry
Common complaints
Unknown
None explicitly mentioned in sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online