← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 32% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 48% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade length: 54.05 mm (2.13 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Overall length: 133.35 mm (5.25 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade thickness: 2.79 mm (0.11 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Weight: 92.68 g (3.27 oz)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Retail price: US$45Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45Most expensive
US$41.99Cheapest
Weight
92.68 g (3.27 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
54.05 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
133.35 mm (5.25 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
114 mm (4.49 in)
Blade thickness
2.79 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
Stainless steel
Finish
Black Stonewash
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Frame Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Flipper
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
Stainless Steel pocket clip (Right - Tip Up)
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday Carry
Everyday carryWork
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Compact sizeSolid feel in-handGood grip due to deep finger choil and thumb friction groovesVersatile for slicing, shaving, chopping, and paring
Well-balanced and solid frame lock actionComfortable stainless steel handle with smooth contouringProtective BlackWash coating hides wear and resists scratchesFast and easy one-handed assisted opening via flipper and thumb stud
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly documented in provided sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online