← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact vs Kershaw Scrambler

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 64% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Scrambler stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade length: 54.05 mm (2.13 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Overall length: 133.35 mm (5.25 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Weight: 92.68 g (3.27 oz)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Retail price: US$45Kershaw Scrambler — Blade length: 88.9 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Scrambler — Overall length: 200 mm (7.87 in)Kershaw Scrambler — Weight: 147.4 g (5.20 oz)Kershaw Scrambler — Retail price: US$39.95Blade lengthOverall lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$45Most expensive
US$39.95Cheapest
Weight
92.68 g (3.27 oz)Lightest
147.4 g (5.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
54.05 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
88.9 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
133.35 mm (5.25 in)Shortest
200 mm (7.87 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
111.1 mm (4.37 in)
Blade thickness
2.79 mm (0.11 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Stainless Steel
Textured G-10 front with steel bolster, 410 steel back
Finish
Black Stonewash
Blade with titanium carbo-nitride coating, handles have titanium carbo-nitride coated bolster and back scale
Lock type
Frame Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Flipper
SpeedSafe assisted opening with ambidextrous flipper
Clip type
Stainless Steel pocket clip (Right - Tip Up)
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry
▣Everyday Carry▣General Use▣Slice Tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Compact Size✓Solid Feel In Hand✓Good Grip Due To Deep Finger Choil And Thumb Friction Grooves✓Versatile For Slicing, Shaving, Chopping, And Paring
✓Smooth And Fast Assisted Opening✓Good Edge Retention For The Steel Type✓Comfortable Handle With Good Grip✓Ambidextrous Carrying Options With Reversible Pocket Clip
Common complaints
Unknown
⚠Weight Is Moderate For Some Users⚠Blade Steel Is Adequate But Not Premium⚠Limited Availability Due To Status Discontinued In Some Listings

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online