← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Tuna vs Kershaw Chive

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Tuna stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Chive stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 57% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 119% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 41% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 71% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Tuna — Blade length: 82 mm (3.23 in)CRKT Tuna — Overall length: 195 mm (7.68 in)CRKT Tuna — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)CRKT Tuna — Blade thickness: 3.8 mm (0.15 in)CRKT Tuna — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)CRKT Tuna — Retail price: US$69.99Kershaw Chive — Blade length: 48 mm (1.89 in)Kershaw Chive — Overall length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Kershaw Chive — Closed length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Chive — Blade thickness: 2.3 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Chive — Weight: 48 g (1.69 oz)Kershaw Chive — Retail price: US$109.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$69.99Cheapest
US$109.99Most expensive
Weight
105 g (3.70 oz)Heaviest
48 g (1.69 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
82 mm (3.23 in)Longest
48 mm (1.89 in)Shortest
Overall length
195 mm (7.68 in)Longest
122 mm (4.80 in)Shortest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.8 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr14MoV stainless steel
420HC stainless steel (also available in Damascus steel)
Handle material
G10 and stainless steel
410 stainless steel
Finish
Black stonewash on blade, stonewash finish on handle steel scale
Bead-blasted finish
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
Tip-up pocket clip, right side
Single-position steel pocket clip, tip-down carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)General useHeavy duty tasks
Everyday carrySmall utility cutting tasksPocket carry
Not best for
Unknown
!Heavy chopping tasks!Tactical use requiring larger blade
Common praise
Rugged and tested locking systemClean and essential linesCompact and lightweightGood grip and durabilityReliable performanceSmooth deployment after break-in
Compact and lightweightDurable steel and handleQuick assisted openingReliable frame lockGreat for everyday carry
Common complaints
Blade not very sharp out of the boxInitially stiff action requiring break-in
Small blade limits use to light tasksNot intended for heavy duty cutting

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online