← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Tuna vs Kershaw Endgame 2095

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Tuna stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Tuna stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Tuna — Blade length: 82 mm (3.23 in)CRKT Tuna — Overall length: 195 mm (7.68 in)CRKT Tuna — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)CRKT Tuna — Blade thickness: 3.8 mm (0.15 in)CRKT Tuna — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)CRKT Tuna — Retail price: US$69.99Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Overall length: 191 mm (7.52 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Weight: 110 g (3.88 oz)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Retail price: US$95.03Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$69.99Cheapest
US$95.03Most expensive
Weight
105 g (3.70 oz)Lightest
110 g (3.88 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
82 mm (3.23 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
195 mm (7.68 in)Longest
191 mm (7.52 in)Shortest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.8 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr14MoV stainless steel
D2 Tool Steel
Handle material
G10 and stainless steel
Steel handle with bronze PVD-coated and glass-filled nylon overlays
Finish
Black stonewash on blade, stonewash finish on handle steel scale
Stonewashed finish
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
Manual flipper with KVT ball bearing system
Clip type
Tip-up pocket clip, right side
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip (tip-up)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)General useHeavy duty tasks
Everyday carryWorkCollection
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Rugged and tested locking systemClean and essential linesCompact and lightweightGood grip and durabilityReliable performanceSmooth deployment after break-in
High edge retention and wear resistance due to D2 tool steelSmooth opening action with KVT ball bearingsMulti-layered and unique handle designReversible deep-carry pocketclip for convenient carry
Common complaints
Blade not very sharp out of the boxInitially stiff action requiring break-in
None explicitly mentioned in sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online