← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Tuna vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Tuna stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Tuna stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Tuna stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Tuna — Blade length: 82 mm (3.23 in)CRKT Tuna — Overall length: 195 mm (7.68 in)CRKT Tuna — Blade thickness: 3.8 mm (0.15 in)CRKT Tuna — Weight: 105 g (3.70 oz)CRKT Tuna — Retail price: US$69.99CRKT Tuna — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Kershaw Filter — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceClosed length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$69.99Most expensive
US$41.99Cheapest
Weight
105 g (3.70 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
82 mm (3.23 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
195 mm (7.68 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)
114 mm (4.49 in)
Blade thickness
3.8 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr14MoV stainless steel
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
G10 and stainless steel
Stainless steel
Finish
Black stonewash on blade, stonewash finish on handle steel scale
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Stud
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
Tip-up pocket clip, right side
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)General useHeavy duty tasks
Everyday carryWork
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Rugged and tested locking systemClean and essential linesCompact and lightweightGood grip and durabilityReliable performanceSmooth deployment after break-in
Well-balanced and solid frame lock actionComfortable stainless steel handle with smooth contouringProtective BlackWash coating hides wear and resists scratchesFast and easy one-handed assisted opening via flipper and thumb stud
Common complaints
Blade not very sharp out of the boxInitially stiff action requiring break-in
None clearly documented in provided sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online