← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Airspace vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Airspace stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Airspace stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Airspace stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 142% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Airspace stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Airspace stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Airspace — Overall length: 179 mm (7.05 in)Kershaw Airspace — Closed length: 103 mm (4.06 in)Kershaw Airspace — Blade thickness: 2.3 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Airspace — Weight: 48 g (1.69 oz)Kershaw Airspace — Retail price: US$71.99Kershaw Airspace — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Overall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceBlade length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$71.99Most expensive
US$65Cheapest
Weight
48 g (1.69 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
76 mm (2.99 in)
76 mm (2.99 in)
Overall length
179 mm (7.05 in)Shortest
180 mm (7.09 in)Longest
Closed length
103 mm (4.06 in)Shortest
104 mm (4.09 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
14C28N stainless steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Polymer with glass fiber
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Satin finish
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
DuraLock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual with KVT ball-bearing pivot and thumb stud
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryOutdoorWork tasks
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
LightweightSmooth and precise cutsDurable reinforced polymer handleEasy manual opening with ball-bearing pivotSecure DuraLock mechanismReversible deep-carry pocketclip
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online