← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Appa vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Appa stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Appa stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 81% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Appa stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 81% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 415% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Appa stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Appa stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Appa stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Appa — Blade length: 70 mm (2.76 in)Kershaw Appa — Overall length: 165 mm (6.50 in)Kershaw Appa — Closed length: 95 mm (3.74 in)Kershaw Appa — Weight: 57 g (2.01 oz)Kershaw Appa — Retail price: US$33Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$33Cheapest
US$169.95Most expensive
Weight
57 g (2.01 oz)Lightest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
70 mm (2.76 in)Shortest
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
Overall length
165 mm (6.50 in)Shortest
183 mm (7.20 in)Longest
Closed length
95 mm (3.74 in)Shortest
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
Blade thickness
Unknown
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
Stainless steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Black-oxide coated blade
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening (SpeedSafe)
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Reversible pocketclip
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryLightweight tactical useEDC tasks like opening packages, cutting rope
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
!Heavy batoning!Prying!Heavy-duty tasks
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and nimbleGood edge retention for priceSecure liner lockComfortable textured handleAffordable tactical design
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Handle material feels plasticky to some usersNot suitable for heavy prying or batoningBlade thickness not specified
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online