← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Bel Air vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Bel Air stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Bel Air stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Bel Air stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Bel Air stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Bel Air stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Bel Air — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Kershaw Bel Air — Closed length: 107 mm (4.21 in)Kershaw Bel Air — Weight: 82 g (2.89 oz)Kershaw Bel Air — Retail price: US$160Kershaw Bel Air — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Blade lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail priceOverall length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$160Cheapest
US$169.95Most expensive
Weight
82 g (2.89 oz)Heaviest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
Overall length
183 mm (7.20 in)
183 mm (7.20 in)
Closed length
107 mm (4.21 in)Shortest
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
Blade thickness
Unknown
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CPM MagnaCut
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
Aluminum
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
Blackwash or Black PVD coating depending on model
Satin
Lock type
DuraLock crossbar lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual KVT ball bearings with thumb stud
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Utility tasksCamping and hikingFoods preparation
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
!Heavy prying tasks!Woodworking requiring thick blade stock
Unknown
Common praise
Excellent corrosion resistanceSmooth, easy deploymentThin blade stock provides superior cutting performanceAmbidextrous, secure locking mechanismComfortable and lightweight aluminum handle
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Pocket clip protrudes slightly from handle causing minor snaggingHeavier than some ultra-light competitorsBlade thickness may flex under heavy pryingInitial limited variants availability
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online