← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Blur vs Zero Tolerance 0700

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Blur stands out as the lightest option for weight. Kershaw Blur stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Blur stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Blur stands out as the lightest option for weight.

Heaviest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the heaviest option for weight.

Shortest

Kershaw Blur stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Blur stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Blur — Blade length: 86 mm (3.39 in)Kershaw Blur — Overall length: 201 mm (7.91 in)Kershaw Blur — Weight: 119 g (4.20 oz)Kershaw Blur — Retail price: US$128Zero Tolerance 0700 — Blade length: 88.9 mm (3.50 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Overall length: 206.375 mm (8.13 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Weight: 119.09 g (4.20 oz)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Retail price: US$136Blade lengthOverall lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$128Cheapest
US$136Most expensive
Weight
119 g (4.20 oz)Lightest
119.09 g (4.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
86 mm (3.39 in)Shortest
88.9 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
201 mm (7.91 in)Shortest
206.375 mm (8.13 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
114.3 mm (4.50 in)
Blade thickness
Unknown
3.07 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
Sandvik 14C28N stainless steel
S30V
Handle material
6061-T6 anodized aluminum with Trac-tec inserts
Textured G-10
Finish
Unknown
Stonewashed
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening (thumb stud with torsion bar)
Flipper and ambidextrous thumbstud
Clip type
Adjustable pocket clip (tip up or tip down)
Reversible pocket clip, tri-mount (tip up/down, single position)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Moderate tasksFast one-handed deployment
Everyday useTacticalOutdoor use
Not best for
!Heavy-duty applications due to possible liner lock failure
Unknown
Common praise
Fast and smooth assisted opening systemExcellent grip and balance even when wetSharp, durable bladeSolid value for performance
Robust and thick blade with strong lockupHigh quality materials and build precisionComfortable textured G-10 handle scalesAmbidextrous opening options and clip carry
Common complaints
Liner lock can fail under heavy pressureSmall thumb stud can strain thumb with repeated usePocket clip is very tight and may pull fabric
Item has been discontinued and is out of stockHeavier than typical lightweight folders due to thick blade

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online