← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Chive vs Spyderco Chicago

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Chicago stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Chive stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Chive — Blade length: 48 mm (1.89 in)Kershaw Chive — Overall length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Kershaw Chive — Closed length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Chive — Blade thickness: 2.3 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Chive — Weight: 48 g (1.69 oz)Kershaw Chive — Retail price: US$109.99Spyderco Chicago — Blade length: 51 mm (2.01 in)Spyderco Chicago — Overall length: 130 mm (5.12 in)Spyderco Chicago — Closed length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Spyderco Chicago — Blade thickness: 2.5 mm (0.10 in)Spyderco Chicago — Weight: 62 g (2.19 oz)Spyderco Chicago — Retail price: US$102Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$109.99Most expensive
US$102Cheapest
Weight
48 g (1.69 oz)Lightest
62 g (2.19 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
48 mm (1.89 in)Shortest
51 mm (2.01 in)Longest
Overall length
122 mm (4.80 in)Shortest
130 mm (5.12 in)Longest
Closed length
74 mm (2.91 in)Shortest
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
420HC stainless steel (also available in Damascus steel)
CTS BD1N
Handle material
410 stainless steel
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Bead-blasted finish
Satin
Lock type
Frame lock
LinerLock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Round Hole
Clip type
Single-position steel pocket clip, tip-down carry
Reversible deep-pocket wire clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carrySmall utility cutting tasksPocket carry
Everyday carryCampingHikingTactical use
Not best for
!Heavy chopping tasks!Tactical use requiring larger blade
Unknown
Common praise
Compact and lightweightDurable steel and handleQuick assisted openingReliable frame lockGreat for everyday carry
Compact and socially friendly sizeDurable CTS BD1N steel blade with good edge retention and corrosion resistanceSecure and comfortable G-10 handle with peel-ply textureReliable LinerLock mechanismReversible deep-pocket wire clip for ambidextrous tip-up carry
Common complaints
Small blade limits use to light tasksNot intended for heavy duty cutting
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online