← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Chive vs Spyderco Cricket C29P

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Chive stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Cricket C29P stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Cricket C29P stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Cricket C29P stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Cricket C29P stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Chive stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Chive — Overall length: 122 mm (4.80 in)Kershaw Chive — Closed length: 74 mm (2.91 in)Kershaw Chive — Blade thickness: 2.3 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Chive — Weight: 48 g (1.69 oz)Kershaw Chive — Retail price: US$109.99Kershaw Chive — Blade length: 48 mm (1.89 in)Spyderco Cricket C29P — Overall length: 118 mm (4.65 in)Spyderco Cricket C29P — Closed length: 71 mm (2.80 in)Spyderco Cricket C29P — Blade thickness: 2 mm (0.08 in)Spyderco Cricket C29P — Weight: 49.6 g (1.75 oz)Spyderco Cricket C29P — Retail price: US$141Spyderco Cricket C29P — Blade length: 48 mm (1.89 in)Overall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceBlade length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$109.99Cheapest
US$141Most expensive
Weight
48 g (1.69 oz)Lightest
49.6 g (1.75 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
48 mm (1.89 in)
48 mm (1.89 in)
Overall length
122 mm (4.80 in)Longest
118 mm (4.65 in)Shortest
Closed length
74 mm (2.91 in)Longest
71 mm (2.80 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.3 mm (0.09 in)Thickest
2 mm (0.08 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
420HC stainless steel (also available in Damascus steel)
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
410 stainless steel
Stainless steel
Finish
Bead-blasted finish
Satin
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Thumb hole ambidextrous one-hand opening
Clip type
Single-position steel pocket clip, tip-down carry
Removable steel pocket clip, right-handed tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carrySmall utility cutting tasksPocket carry
Everyday carryIntricate/detailed cuttingPocket carry
Not best for
!Heavy chopping tasks!Tactical use requiring larger blade
Unknown
Common praise
Compact and lightweightDurable steel and handleQuick assisted openingReliable frame lockGreat for everyday carry
Ultra-thin designConfident frame lockPrecise reverse S-shaped bladeAmbidextrous one-handed openingCompact and lightweight
Common complaints
Small blade limits use to light tasksNot intended for heavy duty cutting
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online