← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Cinder vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 71% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 70% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 70% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 238% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 71% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 249% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 121% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Cinder — Blade length: 36 mm (1.42 in)Kershaw Cinder — Overall length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Cinder — Closed length: 66 mm (2.60 in)Kershaw Cinder — Blade thickness: 2.25 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Cinder — Weight: 26 g (0.92 oz)Kershaw Cinder — Retail price: US$13Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$13Cheapest
US$43.99Most expensive
Weight
26 g (0.92 oz)Lightest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
36 mm (1.42 in)Shortest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Longest
Overall length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Longest
Closed length
66 mm (2.60 in)Shortest
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.25 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
3Cr13
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual, thumb stud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Unknown
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryKeychain useLight cutting tasks
Everyday carry useBox openingLight outdoor tasks
Not best for
!Heavy-duty cutting!Tactical use
Unknown
Common praise
Compact size and portabilityDurable handle materialVersatile upswept drop point bladeIncludes bottle opener tool
Fast and smooth assisted opening actionSecure, comfortable grip with textured handleLightweight and well balancedAffordable price point
Common complaints
Not suited for heavy-duty tasksNo pocket clip for convenience
None clearly supported by sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online