← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Cinder vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 400% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 346% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 58% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 111% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Cinder — Blade length: 36 mm (1.42 in)Kershaw Cinder — Overall length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Cinder — Closed length: 66 mm (2.60 in)Kershaw Cinder — Blade thickness: 2.25 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Cinder — Weight: 26 g (0.92 oz)Kershaw Cinder — Retail price: US$13Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$13Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
26 g (0.92 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
36 mm (1.42 in)Shortest
76 mm (2.99 in)Longest
Overall length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
180 mm (7.09 in)Longest
Closed length
66 mm (2.60 in)Shortest
104 mm (4.09 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.25 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
3Cr13
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual, thumb stud
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Unknown
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryKeychain useLight cutting tasks
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
!Heavy-duty cutting!Tactical use
Unknown
Common praise
Compact size and portabilityDurable handle materialVersatile upswept drop point bladeIncludes bottle opener tool
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Not suited for heavy-duty tasksNo pocket clip for convenience
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online