← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Cinder vs Spyderco Tenacious

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 87% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 87% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 646% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 346% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 41% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 68% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 58% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Tenacious stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 139% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Cinder — Blade length: 36 mm (1.42 in)Kershaw Cinder — Overall length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Cinder — Closed length: 66 mm (2.60 in)Kershaw Cinder — Blade thickness: 2.25 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Cinder — Weight: 26 g (0.92 oz)Kershaw Cinder — Retail price: US$13Spyderco Tenacious — Blade length: 86 mm (3.39 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Closed length: 111 mm (4.37 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Tenacious — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Tenacious — Retail price: US$97Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$13Cheapest
US$97Most expensive
Weight
26 g (0.92 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
36 mm (1.42 in)Shortest
86 mm (3.39 in)Longest
Overall length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
66 mm (2.60 in)Shortest
111 mm (4.37 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.25 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
3Cr13
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Satin or non-reflective black oxide coating
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual, thumb stud
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Unknown
Four-position Pocket Clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryKeychain useLight cutting tasks
Daily CarryOutdoor UseBudget Tactical Use
Not best for
!Heavy-duty cutting!Tactical use
!Heavy-duty construction work!Long term intensive use
Common praise
Compact size and portabilityDurable handle materialVersatile upswept drop point bladeIncludes bottle opener tool
Incredible value for moneyReal G-10 handles, not cheap plasticAmbidextrous 4-way pocket clipFull flat grind provides excellent slicingSmooth action with bronze washersSolid lockup and good ergonomics
Common complaints
Not suited for heavy-duty tasksNo pocket clip for convenience
8Cr13MoV steel requires more frequent sharpeningLiner lock is less advanced than Compression LockNot a deep-carry pocket clip; knife shows in pocketMade in China, not USA

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online