← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Cinder vs Zero Tolerance 0700

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 90% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 946% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 78% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 358% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 42% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 73% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cinder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 147% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Cinder — Blade length: 36 mm (1.42 in)Kershaw Cinder — Overall length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Cinder — Closed length: 66 mm (2.60 in)Kershaw Cinder — Blade thickness: 2.25 mm (0.09 in)Kershaw Cinder — Weight: 26 g (0.92 oz)Kershaw Cinder — Retail price: US$13Zero Tolerance 0700 — Blade length: 88.9 mm (3.50 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Overall length: 206.375 mm (8.13 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Closed length: 114.3 mm (4.50 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Blade thickness: 3.07 mm (0.12 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Weight: 119.09 g (4.20 oz)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Retail price: US$136Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$13Cheapest
US$136Most expensive
Weight
26 g (0.92 oz)Lightest
119.09 g (4.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
36 mm (1.42 in)Shortest
88.9 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
206.375 mm (8.13 in)Longest
Closed length
66 mm (2.60 in)Shortest
114.3 mm (4.50 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.25 mm (0.09 in)Thinnest
3.07 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
3Cr13
S30V
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Textured G-10
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Stonewashed
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual, thumb stud
Flipper and ambidextrous thumbstud
Clip type
Unknown
Reversible pocket clip, tri-mount (tip up/down, single position)
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣Keychain Use▣Light Cutting Tasks
▣Everyday Use▣Tactical▣Outdoor Use
Not best for
!Heavy Duty Cutting!Tactical Use
Unknown
Common praise
✓Compact Size And Portability✓Durable Handle Material✓Versatile Upswept Drop Point Blade✓Includes Bottle Opener Tool
✓Robust And Thick Blade With Strong Lockup✓High Quality Materials And Build Precision✓Comfortable Textured G 10 Handle Scales✓Ambidextrous Opening Options And Clip Carry
Common complaints
⚠Not Suited For Heavy Duty Tasks⚠No Pocket Clip For Convenience
⚠Item Has Been Discontinued And Is Out Of Stock⚠Heavier Than Typical Lightweight Folders Due To Thick Blade

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online