← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Cryo II vs Kershaw Fatback

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 80% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Cryo II stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Fatback stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Cryo II — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Cryo II — Closed length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Kershaw Cryo II — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Kershaw Cryo II — Weight: 156 g (5.50 oz)Kershaw Cryo II — Retail price: US$79Kershaw Cryo II — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Kershaw Fatback — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Fatback — Blade thickness: 3.75 mm (0.15 in)Kershaw Fatback — Weight: 102 g (3.60 oz)Kershaw Fatback — Retail price: US$43.99Kershaw Fatback — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Blade lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceOverall length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$79Most expensive
US$43.99Cheapest
Weight
156 g (5.50 oz)Heaviest
102 g (3.60 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
83 mm (3.27 in)Shortest
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
197 mm (7.76 in)
197 mm (7.76 in)
Closed length
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thinnest
3.75 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV
Handle material
Stainless steel
Glass-filled nylon
Finish
Titanium carbo-nitride coating on blade and handle (Gray or BlackWash)
Black-oxide coating
Lock type
Frame lock with lockbar stabilizer
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted (flipper or thumbstud)
Assisted opening with flipper
Clip type
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
4-position deep-carry (right/left; tip-up/down)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryWorkTactical use
Everyday carryTactical use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Sturdy and aesthetically pleasing designReliable frame lock with lockbar stabilizerSmooth, fast SpeedSafe assisted openingComfortable handle with secure gripDeep-carry reversible pocket clip for versatile carry
Good grip due to aggressive texturingReliable assisted openingVersatile ambidextrous pocket clip positionsAffordable price
Common complaints
Heavier weight compared to some alternatives (~156g)Some users find the factory edge out of the box less than optimalSlick blade coating may be slippery with dirty handsAssisted opening tuning less optimal for thumb stud use
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online