← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Endgame 2095 vs Spyderco Chicago

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 77% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 63% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Overall length: 191 mm (7.52 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Weight: 110 g (3.88 oz)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Retail price: US$95.03Spyderco Chicago — Blade length: 51 mm (2.01 in)Spyderco Chicago — Overall length: 130 mm (5.12 in)Spyderco Chicago — Closed length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Spyderco Chicago — Blade thickness: 2.5 mm (0.10 in)Spyderco Chicago — Weight: 62 g (2.19 oz)Spyderco Chicago — Retail price: US$102Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$95.03Cheapest
US$102Most expensive
Weight
110 g (3.88 oz)Heaviest
62 g (2.19 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
51 mm (2.01 in)Shortest
Overall length
191 mm (7.52 in)Longest
130 mm (5.12 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2 Tool Steel
CTS BD1N
Handle material
Steel handle with bronze PVD-coated and glass-filled nylon overlays
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Satin
Lock type
Frame lock
LinerLock
Opening method
Manual flipper with KVT ball bearing system
Round Hole
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip (tip-up)
Reversible deep-pocket wire clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryWorkCollection
Everyday carryCampingHikingTactical use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
High edge retention and wear resistance due to D2 tool steelSmooth opening action with KVT ball bearingsMulti-layered and unique handle designReversible deep-carry pocketclip for convenient carry
Compact and socially friendly sizeDurable CTS BD1N steel blade with good edge retention and corrosion resistanceSecure and comfortable G-10 handle with peel-ply textureReliable LinerLock mechanismReversible deep-pocket wire clip for ambidextrous tip-up carry
Common complaints
None explicitly mentioned in sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online