← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Endgame 2095 vs Spyderco Southard

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Southard stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 205% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Southard stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Southard stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Endgame 2095 stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Southard stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Overall length: 191 mm (7.52 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Blade thickness: 2.8 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Weight: 110 g (3.88 oz)Kershaw Endgame 2095 — Retail price: US$95.03Spyderco Southard — Blade length: 88 mm (3.46 in)Spyderco Southard — Overall length: 202 mm (7.95 in)Spyderco Southard — Closed length: 116 mm (4.57 in)Spyderco Southard — Blade thickness: 3.9 mm (0.15 in)Spyderco Southard — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Southard — Retail price: US$289.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$95.03Cheapest
US$289.95Most expensive
Weight
110 g (3.88 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
83 mm (3.27 in)Shortest
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
Overall length
191 mm (7.52 in)Shortest
202 mm (7.95 in)Longest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
116 mm (4.57 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3.9 mm (0.15 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
D2 Tool Steel
CTS-204P
Handle material
Steel handle with bronze PVD-coated and glass-filled nylon overlays
G10, Titanium
Finish
Stonewashed finish
Stonewashed, satin finish (depending on variant)
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Manual flipper with KVT ball bearing system
Flipper, thumb hole
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocketclip (tip-up)
Stainless steel, tip-up, right side carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryWorkCollection
Everyday carryEDCHigh-performance folding knife use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
High edge retention and wear resistance due to D2 tool steelSmooth opening action with KVT ball bearingsMulti-layered and unique handle designReversible deep-carry pocketclip for convenient carry
Excellent ergonomicsAdvanced materials and constructionSolid locking mechanismAmbidextrous one-hand opening
Common complaints
None explicitly mentioned in sources
Flipper opening can be stiff and cause finger discomfort without break-inLockup may feel less than ideal to some users (~60-70%)

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online