← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Fraxion vs Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 66% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 66% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 193% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 44% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Fraxion stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Fraxion — Blade length: 70 mm (2.76 in)Kershaw Fraxion — Overall length: 171 mm (6.73 in)Kershaw Fraxion — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Kershaw Fraxion — Weight: 54 g (1.90 oz)Kershaw Fraxion — Retail price: US$58Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$58Cheapest
US$169.95Most expensive
Weight
54 g (1.90 oz)Lightest
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
70 mm (2.76 in)Shortest
81 mm (3.19 in)Longest
Overall length
171 mm (6.73 in)Shortest
183 mm (7.20 in)Longest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2.75 mm (0.11 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
VG-10 Stainless Steel
Handle material
G10 with carbon fiber overlay
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Finish
BlackWash black-oxide coating
Satin
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual with flipper using KVT ball bearing system
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Reversible deep-carry pocket clip, tip-up
Reversible steel pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryLightweight carryContemporary look enthusiasts
Everyday CarryCollector
Not best for
!Heavy duty cutting tasks!Fixed blade applications
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and slim designSharp and easy to resharpen bladeSmooth and quick manual openingDurable G10 handle with carbon fiber overlayReversible pocket clip for ambidextrous carry
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Common complaints
Discontinued status limiting availability
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online