← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw FreeFall vs Kershaw Oso Sweet

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw FreeFall stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw FreeFall stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 57% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw FreeFall stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw FreeFall stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Oso Sweet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw FreeFall stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw FreeFall — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw FreeFall — Overall length: 191 mm (7.52 in)Kershaw FreeFall — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw FreeFall — Weight: 116.22 g (4.10 oz)Kershaw FreeFall — Retail price: US$27.97Kershaw Oso Sweet — Blade length: 79.5 mm (3.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Overall length: 184.4 mm (7.26 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Weight: 90.7 g (3.20 oz)Kershaw Oso Sweet — Retail price: US$43.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$27.97Cheapest
US$43.99Most expensive
Weight
116.22 g (4.10 oz)Heaviest
90.7 g (3.20 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
79.5 mm (3.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
191 mm (7.52 in)Longest
184.4 mm (7.26 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
105 mm (4.13 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
Unknown
2.8 mm (0.11 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass filled nylon (GFN)
Glass-Filled Nylon (GRN)
Finish
Stonewash
Satin finish blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper and thumbstud
SpeedSafe assisted opening (flipper/extended tang)
Clip type
Reversible, end to end, deep-carry steel pocket clip
Reversible pocket clip (tip-up or tip-down)
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣Tough Piercing Tasks▣Tactical Style Use
▣Everyday Carry Use▣Box Opening▣Light Outdoor Tasks
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Ergonomic Palm Gripping Handle With Secure K Texture Grip✓Speed Safe Assisted One Hand Opening✓Tactical Styling And Comfortable Hand Fit✓Reversible And Adjustable Deep Carry Clip
✓Fast And Smooth Assisted Opening Action✓Secure, Comfortable Grip With Textured Handle✓Lightweight And Well Balanced✓Affordable Price Point
Common complaints
Unknown
⚠None Clearly Supported By Sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online