← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Kuro vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Kuro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Kuro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Kuro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Kuro stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Kuro stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Kuro stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Kuro — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Kuro — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Kershaw Kuro — Closed length: 105 mm (4.13 in)Kershaw Kuro — Blade thickness: 2.74 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Kuro — Weight: 94 g (3.32 oz)Kershaw Kuro — Retail price: US$50.99Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$50.99Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
94 g (3.32 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
Overall length
184 mm (7.24 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
105 mm (4.13 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.74 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Black oxide coating
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Assisted opening with flipper
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
3-position (right/left, tip-up; right, tip-down)
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryWork useCutting fibrous materials
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Fast assisted opening with ambidextrous flipperGood edge-holding and strength from 8Cr13MoV steelDurable handle material with good gripVersatile blade with tanto point and partial serration
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online