← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Method vs Spyderco Chicago

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Method stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Method stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 51% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 104% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Method stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Method stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Chicago stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Method stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 49% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Method — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Kershaw Method — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Kershaw Method — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Method — Blade thickness: 2.9 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Method — Weight: 63 g (2.22 oz)Kershaw Method — Retail price: US$49.99Spyderco Chicago — Blade length: 51 mm (2.01 in)Spyderco Chicago — Overall length: 130 mm (5.12 in)Spyderco Chicago — Closed length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Spyderco Chicago — Blade thickness: 2.5 mm (0.10 in)Spyderco Chicago — Weight: 62 g (2.19 oz)Spyderco Chicago — Retail price: US$102Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$49.99Cheapest
US$102Most expensive
Weight
63 g (2.22 oz)Heaviest
62 g (2.19 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
76 mm (2.99 in)Longest
51 mm (2.01 in)Shortest
Overall length
184 mm (7.24 in)Longest
130 mm (5.12 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.9 mm (0.11 in)Thickest
2.5 mm (0.10 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
CTS BD1N
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
G-10 Laminate
Finish
BlackWash™ (black-oxide coating)
Satin
Lock type
Inset liner lock
LinerLock
Opening method
Manual, KVT ball-bearing system with built-in flipper
Round Hole
Clip type
Single-position pocketclip (right side, tip-up)
Reversible deep-pocket wire clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryGeneral outdoor use
Everyday carryCampingHikingTactical use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and easy to carryHolds a sharp edge well and is easy to sharpenSmooth, quick manual opening with flipperGood blade protection with BlackWash coatingSecure liner lock and quality handle materials
Compact and socially friendly sizeDurable CTS BD1N steel blade with good edge retention and corrosion resistanceSecure and comfortable G-10 handle with peel-ply textureReliable LinerLock mechanismReversible deep-pocket wire clip for ambidextrous tip-up carry
Common complaints
Discontinued model; may be harder to findRight hand tip-up clip only, limiting carry options
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online