← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Method vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Method stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Method stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Method stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 30% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Method stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 46% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 84% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Method stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Method stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Method — Overall length: 184 mm (7.24 in)Kershaw Method — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Method — Blade thickness: 2.9 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Method — Weight: 63 g (2.22 oz)Kershaw Method — Retail price: US$49.99Kershaw Method — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Overall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail priceBlade length
Price & carry
Retail price
US$49.99Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
63 g (2.22 oz)Lightest
116 g (4.09 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
76 mm (2.99 in)
76 mm (2.99 in)
Overall length
184 mm (7.24 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.9 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
G-10 Laminate
G-10 Laminate
Finish
BlackWash™ (black-oxide coating)
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Inset liner lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Manual, KVT ball-bearing system with built-in flipper
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Single-position pocketclip (right side, tip-up)
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣General Outdoor Use
▣Everyday Carry▣Tactical Use▣Value Oriented Users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Lightweight And Easy To Carry✓Holds A Sharp Edge Well And Is Easy To Sharpen✓Smooth, Quick Manual Opening With Flipper✓Good Blade Protection With Blackwash Coating✓Secure Liner Lock And Quality Handle Materials
✓Good Value For The Price✓Solid Build Quality For A Budget Blade✓Comfortable Ergonomic Handle✓Effective And Secure Liner Lock Mechanism✓Reversible Clip For Versatile Carry Options
Common complaints
⚠Discontinued Model; May Be Harder To Find⚠Right Hand Tip Up Clip Only, Limiting Carry Options
⚠Blade Steel Is Lower End (8cr13mov) Compared To High End Knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online