Comparison Console
Microtech Cypher D/E vs Spyderco Slysz Bowie
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative. Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Cypher D/E stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$438Cheapest
US$450Most expensive
Weight
112 g (3.95 oz)Lightest
122 g (4.30 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
87 mm (3.43 in)Shortest
Overall length
216 mm (8.50 in)Longest
198 mm (7.80 in)Shortest
Closed length
127 mm (5.00 in)Longest
111 mm (4.37 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
2.8 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
3.5 mm (0.14 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390MK stainless steel
M390
Handle material
Aluminum
Titanium
Finish
Stonewash (blue stonewash variant), black (turquoise variant)
Satin / stonewashed (varies by version)
Lock type
Slide lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Dual-action out-the-front (OTF) thumb slide
Thumb Hole
Clip type
Tip-down pocket clip
Wire clip, reversible deep-pocket
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryOutdoor useProfessional useCollection
Everyday carryMedium-sized folding knife usersUsers desiring a premium titanium framelock folder
Not best for
Unknown
Heavy duty cutting choresUsers needing large fixed blades
Common praise
Superior edge retentionExceptional hardnessGood corrosion resistanceSmooth and reliable dual-action deploymentLightweight and ergonomic handleDurable blade finish (stonewash or black)
High quality manufacturingComfortable ergonomicsSmooth deploymentRefined frame lockGood balance and medium sizeExcellent blade steel (M390 or CTS-XHP)Suitable for everyday carry
Common complaints
Unknown
Higher price pointSome design changes less desirable compared to original modelOriginal stonewashed finish replaced by satin in newer versionRough edges at blade opening hole and jimping on new versionLong handle may feel disproportionate for some users
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online