Comparison Console
Microtech Exocet vs Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative. Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 73% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 73% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Exocet stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 274% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 7% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Exocet stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 8% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Exocet stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 62% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech Exocet stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-85 Bounty Hunter stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$299Most expensive
US$80Cheapest
Weight
85 g (3.00 oz)Heaviest
79 g (2.79 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
49.5 mm (1.95 in)Shortest
80 mm (3.15 in)Longest
Overall length
143 mm (5.63 in)Shortest
200 mm (7.87 in)Longest
Closed length
Unknown
115 mm (4.53 in)
Blade thickness
1.52 mm (0.06 in)Thinnest
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390MK (Apocalyptic), CTS-204P, or varied steel types
D2 High-Speed Steel
Handle material
6061-T6 Aluminum
T6061 Aviation Aluminum
Finish
Apocalyptic, Anodized
Type II / Type III Hard Anodize, Sandblasted and Brushed (black handle), Mirror Polish Stone Wash + Sandblasted and Brushed (green handle)
Lock type
Out The Front (OTF)
Out-the-front Automatic (Double-Action)
Opening method
Double Action OTF Automatic (thumb slider)
Thumb slide
Clip type
Pocket clip doubling as money clip
Large bent steel clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryDiscreet CarryCalifornia Legal CarryUtility And Practical Use
Everyday CarryTactical UseCompact CarryFast Deployment Use
Not best for
Unknown
Heavy Duty PryingChoppingCarvingTasks Requiring Robust Blade Thickness
Common praise
Compact And LightweightInnovative Money Clip IntegrationCalifornia Legal Blade LengthHigh Quality Materials And ConstructionSharp Dual Edge Dagger Blade
Compact And Lightweight For An Automatic KnifeExceptionally Fast And Reliable Out The Front DeploymentHigh Quality M390/d2 Steel Blades With Good Edge RetentionDurable Cnc Machined Aluminum Handle With Quality AnodizingTactical And EDC Versatile Blade Options Including Tanto And Drop Point
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade Thickness And Size Not Suitable For Heavy Duty UseHandle Surface Finish Can Scratch EasilyLarge Pocket Clip May Be Bulky
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online