← Back

Comparison Console

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III vs Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative. Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III — Blade length: 89 mm (3.50 in)Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III — Overall length: 203 mm (7.99 in)Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III — Weight: 102.06 g (3.60 oz)Microtech LUDT S/E Gen III — Retail price: US$286Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo — Blade length: 86.05 mm (3.39 in)Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo — Overall length: 195.58 mm (7.70 in)Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo — Closed length: 109.73 mm (4.32 in)Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo — Weight: 99.22 g (3.50 oz)Microtech Mini SOCOM Bravo — Retail price: US$325Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$286Cheapest
US$325Most expensive
Weight
102.06 g (3.60 oz)Heaviest
99.22 g (3.50 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
89 mm (3.50 in)Longest
86.05 mm (3.39 in)Shortest
Overall length
203 mm (7.99 in)Longest
195.58 mm (7.70 in)Shortest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
109.73 mm (4.32 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.175 mm (0.13 in)
Unknown
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390MK
M390 Stainless Steel
Handle material
6061-T6 aluminum
Titanium with Carbon Fiber scales
Finish
Stonewash or Apocalyptic
Blade: Bead Blasted, Handle: Blasted Titanium
Lock type
Button Lock
Unknown
Opening method
Push Button Automatic
Manual
Clip type
Tip-Up Pocket Clip
Titanium tip-up pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
▣Everyday Carry▣Tactical▣Water Resistant Use▣Hard Use
▣Everyday Carry▣Lightweight Robust Performance▣Discerning Knife Enthusiasts
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
✓Smooth Deployment With 24 Silica Carbide Bearings✓Excellent Edge Retention Due To Proprietary M390mk Steel✓Durable And Lightweight 6061 T6 Aluminum Handle✓Secure Tip Up Pocket Clip✓Water Resistant And Rugged Design Suitable For Hard Use
✓Lightweight Yet Robust Performance✓Precision Engineering✓Elegant Titanium And Carbon Fiber Handle Design✓Quality Craftsmanship
Common complaints
⚠None Clearly Stated In Sources
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online