← Back

Comparison Console

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK vs Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the lightest option for weight. Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the lightest option for weight.

Heaviest

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the heaviest option for weight.

Shortest

Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 18% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Blade length: 77.47 mm (3.05 in)Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Overall length: 181.36 mm (7.14 in)Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Closed length: 128 mm (5.04 in)Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Blade thickness: 4.06 mm (0.16 in)Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Weight: 213 g (7.51 oz)Microtech Mini Stitch RAM-LOK — Retail price: US$274Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Blade length: 95 mm (3.74 in)Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Overall length: 217 mm (8.54 in)Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Closed length: 127 mm (5.00 in)Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Blade thickness: 4.1 mm (0.16 in)Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Weight: 212.6 g (7.50 oz)Microtech Stitch RAM-LOK — Retail price: US$384Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$274Cheapest
US$384Most expensive
Weight
213 g (7.51 oz)Heaviest
212.6 g (7.50 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
77.47 mm (3.05 in)Shortest
95 mm (3.74 in)Longest
Overall length
181.36 mm (7.14 in)Shortest
217 mm (8.54 in)Longest
Closed length
128 mm (5.04 in)Longest
127 mm (5.00 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
4.06 mm (0.16 in)Thinnest
4.1 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390MK
Bohler M390MK stainless steel
Handle material
Aluminum
G10, Carbon Fiber, or Titanium (depending on variant)
Finish
Stonewash
Apocalyptic finish or Black full serrate variant depending on model
Lock type
RAM-LOK (Bar Lock)
RAM-LOK (Bar Lock)
Opening method
Manual folder
Manual thumb hole or dual thumb studs
Clip type
Tip-up Clip
Tip up or tip down pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryControl and reliabilityPremium performance
Everyday carryTactical useCollection
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Secure lockup with RAM-LOK Bar LockLightweight and durable aluminum handleExceptional edge retention and corrosion resistance of M390MK steelSmooth, confident manual operationCompact and aggressive design suited for EDC
High-quality materials and constructionReliable RAM-LOK locking mechanismErgonomic handle and secure gripGood balance of size and weight for EDC
Common complaints
Unknown
Price is high for some variantsSome users desire automatic version

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online