Comparison Console
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E vs Spyderco Chaparral
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Chaparral stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Chaparral stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Chaparral stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Microtech UTX-70 Gen IV S/E stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Chaparral stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$249Cheapest
US$286Most expensive
Weight
40 g (1.41 oz)Lightest
62 g (2.19 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
63.5 mm (2.50 in)Shortest
71 mm (2.80 in)Longest
Overall length
152.4 mm (6.00 in)Shortest
162 mm (6.38 in)Longest
Closed length
82 mm (3.23 in)Shortest
91 mm (3.58 in)Longest
Blade thickness
2 mm (0.08 in)Thickest
1.9 mm (0.07 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390MK
CTS-XHP stainless steel
Handle material
Aluminum
Birdseye Maple or FRN (Fiberglass Reinforced Nylon)
Finish
Apocalyptic or Stonewashed depending on variant
Satin
Lock type
Out The Front
Back Lock
Opening method
Double-action OTF automatic
Thumb hole (Round Hole)
Clip type
Tip-Down
Reversible deep pocket wire clip for tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryEDCDiscreet UtilityTactical UseCollector
Everyday Carry (EDC)Gentleman's KnifeLightweight SlicingOffice Use
Not best for
Heavy Duty Cutting Requiring Large Blade Length
Heavy Duty WorkHard Use Cutting Tasks
Common praise
Compact Size Fits Watch PocketSmooth And Reliable Double Action Otf MechanismPremium M390 Blade SteelLightweight Aluminum HandleHigh Build Quality And Craftsmanship
Lightweight And Slim DesignExcellent Ergonomics With Good Grip Texture And Finger ChoilHigh Quality Cts Xhp Steel Blade With Great Edge Retention And Corrosion ResistanceSolid Back Lock Mechanism With Satisfying Lock UpAmbidextrous One Handed Opening Via Large Round HoleReversible Deep Pocket Clip For Tip Up Carry
Common complaints
Small Blade Size Limits Heavy Cutting Tasks
Lock Bar May Be Stiff To Disengage On Some Models
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online