← Back

Comparison Console

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder vs Zero Tolerance 0700

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 53% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0700 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Zero Tolerance 0700 — Blade length: 88.9 mm (3.50 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Overall length: 206.375 mm (8.13 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Closed length: 114.3 mm (4.50 in)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Weight: 119.09 g (4.20 oz)Zero Tolerance 0700 — Retail price: US$136Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$169.95Most expensive
US$136Cheapest
Weight
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Lightest
119.09 g (4.20 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
88.9 mm (3.50 in)Longest
Overall length
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
206.375 mm (8.13 in)Longest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
114.3 mm (4.50 in)Longest
Blade thickness
Unknown
3.07 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
S30V
Handle material
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Textured G-10
Finish
Satin
Stonewashed
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Hole
Flipper and ambidextrous thumbstud
Clip type
Reversible steel pocket clip
Reversible pocket clip, tri-mount (tip up/down, single position)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryCollector
Everyday useTacticalOutdoor use
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Robust and thick blade with strong lockupHigh quality materials and build precisionComfortable textured G-10 handle scalesAmbidextrous opening options and clip carry
Common complaints
Unknown
Item has been discontinued and is out of stockHeavier than typical lightweight folders due to thick blade

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online