← Back

Comparison Console

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder vs Zero Tolerance 0990

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Zero Tolerance 0990 stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 55% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Zero Tolerance 0990 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0990 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Zero Tolerance 0990 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 2% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Blade length: 81 mm (3.19 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Overall length: 183 mm (7.20 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Weight: 77.99 g (2.75 oz)Spyderco Lum Chinese Folder — Retail price: US$169.95Zero Tolerance 0990 — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Zero Tolerance 0990 — Overall length: 193 mm (7.60 in)Zero Tolerance 0990 — Closed length: 112 mm (4.41 in)Zero Tolerance 0990 — Weight: 82.2 g (2.90 oz)Zero Tolerance 0990 — Retail price: US$264Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$169.95Cheapest
US$264Most expensive
Weight
77.99 g (2.75 oz)Lightest
82.2 g (2.90 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
81 mm (3.19 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
193 mm (7.60 in)Longest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
112 mm (4.41 in)Longest
Blade thickness
Unknown
3.1 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
VG-10 Stainless Steel
CPM 20CV stainless steel
Handle material
Blue Almite anodized aluminum with steel liners and backspacer
Carbon Fiber and Stainless Steel
Finish
Satin
Stonewashed
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
Thumb Hole
Flipper
Clip type
Reversible steel pocket clip
Reversible, deep-carry pocket clip, tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryCollector
Everyday carryPrecision cuttingDurable outdoor useFast deployment
Not best for
Unknown
!Heavy chopping or hard use beyond standard EDC tasks
Common praise
High-quality VG-10 steel bladeCompact and light design at 2.75 oz.Collector's favorite with limited production
Excellent edge retention and corrosion resistance of CPM 20CV bladeSmooth and fast flipper deployment thanks to KVT ball bearingsDurable and lightweight carbon fiber and stainless steel handleStrong and reliable liner lock with hardened steel insertAmbidextrous reversible pocket clip for tip-up carry
Common complaints
Unknown
None explicitly cited in the provided sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online