Comparison Console
Spyderco Slysz Bowie vs WE Knife Arrakis
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
WE Knife Arrakis stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 59% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Arrakis stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 144% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Arrakis stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Arrakis stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 3% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Arrakis stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 1% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$450Cheapest
US$1100Most expensive
Weight
122 g (4.30 oz)Heaviest
106 g (3.74 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
87 mm (3.43 in)Shortest
88.2 mm (3.47 in)Longest
Overall length
198 mm (7.80 in)Shortest
202.9 mm (7.99 in)Longest
Closed length
111 mm (4.37 in)Shortest
114.7 mm (4.52 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.5 mm (0.14 in)Thinnest
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390
Damasteel (Fafnir)
Handle material
Titanium
6AL4V Titanium with Timascus inlay
Finish
Satin / stonewashed (varies by version)
Unknown
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Hole
Flipper
Clip type
Wire clip, reversible deep-pocket
Tip-Up, Right Carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday CarryMedium Sized Folding Knife UsersUsers Desiring A Premium Titanium Framelock Folder
Everyday Carry (EDC)CollectorsUsers Seeking Integral Titanium Frame KnifeFans Of Elijah Isham Designs
Not best for
Heavy Duty Cutting ChoresUsers Needing Large Fixed Blades
Unknown
Common praise
High Quality ManufacturingComfortable ErgonomicsSmooth DeploymentRefined Frame LockGood Balance And Medium SizeExcellent Blade Steel (M390 Or Cts Xhp)Suitable For Everyday Carry
Impressive Engineering And CraftsmanshipSmooth Ceramic Ball Bearing PivotUnique Integral Titanium Handle DesignHigh Quality Damasteel BladeAttractive Flame Titanium And Carbon Fiber Inlays
Common complaints
Higher Price PointSome Design Changes Less Desirable Compared To Original ModelOriginal Stonewashed Finish Replaced By Satin In Newer VersionRough Edges At Blade Opening Hole And Jimping On New VersionLong Handle May Feel Disproportionate For Some Users
Price Is High Compared To Typical EDC KnivesLarge Size May Not Suit All Users
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online