Comparison Console
Spyderco Slysz Bowie vs WE Knife Integral
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative. WE Knife Integral stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
WE Knife Integral stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Integral stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 16% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Integral stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Slysz Bowie stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Integral stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$450Most expensive
US$300Cheapest
Weight
122 g (4.30 oz)Lightest
141.7 g (5.00 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
87 mm (3.43 in)Shortest
99 mm (3.90 in)Longest
Overall length
198 mm (7.80 in)Shortest
226 mm (8.90 in)Longest
Closed length
111 mm (4.37 in)Shortest
127 mm (5.00 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.5 mm (0.14 in)Thinnest
4.06 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
M390
Bohler M390 stainless steel
Handle material
Titanium
Titanium
Finish
Satin / stonewashed (varies by version)
Satin blade finish, gray anodized titanium handle finish
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame lock
Opening method
Thumb Hole
Flipper
Clip type
Wire clip, reversible deep-pocket
Removable titanium pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryMedium-sized folding knife usersUsers desiring a premium titanium framelock folder
Everyday carryGeneral EDC conditionsUsers wanting an integral folder with good ergonomics and aesthetics
Not best for
Heavy duty cutting choresUsers needing large fixed blades
Heavy hard useUsers requiring extreme ruggedness
Common praise
High quality manufacturingComfortable ergonomicsSmooth deploymentRefined frame lockGood balance and medium sizeExcellent blade steel (M390 or CTS-XHP)Suitable for everyday carry
High value integral folderBeautiful and affordableExcellent ergonomicsSmooth and reliable flipper mechanismSolid and reassuring feel in handGood build quality for the price
Common complaints
Higher price pointSome design changes less desirable compared to original modelOriginal stonewashed finish replaced by satin in newer versionRough edges at blade opening hole and jimping on new versionLong handle may feel disproportionate for some users
Heavier than typical folding knives due to integral handlePocket clip may be polarizing due to 3D sculpted designStop pin placement might limit extreme hard use
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online