Comparison Console
Spyderco Southard vs WE Knife Roxi 3
EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Spyderco Southard stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative. WE Knife Roxi 3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
WE Knife Roxi 3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 21% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Southard stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Southard stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Roxi 3 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Roxi 3 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Southard stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
WE Knife Roxi 3 stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 9% gap from the closest alternative.
Spyderco Southard stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 10% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$289.95Most expensive
US$229.5Cheapest
Weight
116 g (4.09 oz)Lightest
121 g (4.27 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
88 mm (3.46 in)Longest
80 mm (3.15 in)Shortest
Overall length
202 mm (7.95 in)Longest
183 mm (7.20 in)Shortest
Closed length
116 mm (4.57 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3.9 mm (0.15 in)Thinnest
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CTS-204P
CPM S35VN stainless steel
Handle material
G10, Titanium
6AL4V Titanium
Finish
Stonewashed, satin finish (depending on variant)
Stonewashed
Lock type
Frame lock
Frame Lock
Opening method
Flipper, thumb hole
Front Flipper
Clip type
Stainless steel, tip-up, right side carry
Tip-Up, Right Carry Titanium pocket clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryEDCHigh-performance folding knife use
EDCUtility tasksHard use cutting
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Excellent ergonomicsAdvanced materials and constructionSolid locking mechanismAmbidextrous one-hand opening
High-end materials such as CPM S35VN steel and titanium handleSmooth flipping action with ceramic ball bearingsCompact and ergonomic designDurable frame lock mechanismAttractive stonewashed finish and tiger stripe pattern on some models
Common complaints
Flipper opening can be stiff and cause finger discomfort without break-inLockup may feel less than ideal to some users (~60-70%)
Unknown
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online