← Back

Comparison Console

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 vs WE Knife Tayra

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative. WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 37% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

WE Knife Tayra stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 58% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

WE Knife Tayra stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 19% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

WE Knife Tayra stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 23% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

WE Knife Tayra stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Blade length: 77 mm (3.03 in)WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Overall length: 174 mm (6.85 in)WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Closed length: 97 mm (3.82 in)WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Blade thickness: 3.2 mm (0.13 in)WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Weight: 65 g (2.29 oz)WE Knife Miscreant 3.0 — Retail price: US$199WE Knife Tayra — Blade length: 55.5 mm (2.19 in)WE Knife Tayra — Overall length: 174.6 mm (6.87 in)WE Knife Tayra — Closed length: 119.1 mm (4.69 in)WE Knife Tayra — Blade thickness: 4 mm (0.16 in)WE Knife Tayra — Weight: 97.2 g (3.43 oz)WE Knife Tayra — Retail price: US$315Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$199Cheapest
US$315Most expensive
Weight
65 g (2.29 oz)Lightest
97.2 g (3.43 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
77 mm (3.03 in)Longest
55.5 mm (2.19 in)Shortest
Overall length
174 mm (6.85 in)Shortest
174.6 mm (6.87 in)Longest
Closed length
97 mm (3.82 in)Shortest
119.1 mm (4.69 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3.2 mm (0.13 in)Thinnest
4 mm (0.16 in)Thickest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
CPM 20CV
Bohler M390
Handle material
6AL4V Titanium
6AL4V Titanium
Finish
Gray Stonewashed
Black Stonewashed Bevels, Black Brushed Flats (variant WE24069-1); Plain Stonewash (variant WE24069-2); Hand Rubbed Satin (variant WE24069-3)
Lock type
Frame lock with reinforced steel inlay
Frame Lock
Opening method
Flipper with ceramic ball bearings
Flipper with Caged Ceramic Ball Bearing
Clip type
Tip-up, right carry
Tip-Up, Left/Right reversible titanium clip
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carry (EDC)Food preparationGeneral utility work
Everyday carry (EDC)Utility workCollectorsEnthusiasts
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Lightweight and slim design for easy portabilitySmooth and effortless flipper opening with ceramic ball bearingsWell-made with high quality materials and fit and finish
Exceptional build qualitySmooth and fast deploymentHigh-performance M390 blade steelErgonomic titanium handle with integrated finger ringLightweight and compact for carry
Common complaints
Unknown
Price may be high for some usersVariant availability varies

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online