Comparison Console
Leatherman MUT EOD vs Leatherman Wave (2004)
EDC Multitools comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative. Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative. Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman MUT EOD stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 77% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 29% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman MUT EOD stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 42% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman MUT EOD stands out as the fewest tools option for tool count, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 20% gap from the closest alternative.
Leatherman MUT EOD stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 25% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$229.95Most expensive
US$130Cheapest
Weight
317.5 g (11.20 oz)Heaviest
224 g (7.90 oz)Lightest
Closed length
127 mm (5.00 in)Longest
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
Open length
189.2 mm (7.45 in)Longest
158 mm (6.22 in)Shortest
Dimensions
Width
38 mm (1.50 in)Widest
36 mm (1.42 in)Narrowest
Thickness
20 mm (0.79 in)
20 mm (0.79 in)
Tools
Tool count
15Fewest tools
17Most tools
Tools
Needlenose PliersPremium Replaceable Fuse Wire CuttersMilitary Performance Spec Cap CrimperElectrical Crimper420hc Combo KnifeSawReplaceable Cutting HookHammerBolt Override ToolReplaceable C4 PunchReplaceable Bronze Carbon Scraper#8 32 Cleaning Rod/brush AdaptersCarabiner/bottle OpenerLarge Bit DriverStranded Wire Cutters
Pliers With Wire Cutters (needlenose & Regular)Wire CuttersLarge Locking BladeSerrated BladeWood SawMetal SawFile With Diamond FileCan OpenerBottle OpenerScissorsBit DriverSmall Bit DriverMedium ScrewdriverPhillips ScrewdriverHard Wire CutterWire StripperSpring Action Scissors
Plier type
Unknown
Needle-nose and Regular Pliers
One-hand opening
Yes
Yes
Pocket clip
Yes
Unknown
Sheath included
Unknown
Yes
Use case profile
Best for
Eod And Bomb Squad OperationsMilitary And Tactical UseJobs Requiring Multiple Specialized ToolsUsers Needing A Rugged Multi Tool With Replaceable Parts
TradespersonsEveryday Carry With Strong Tool VersatilityOutdoor And Farm Use
Common praise
Comprehensive Toolset Tailored For Eod And Tactical TasksRobust Build Quality With Replaceable ComponentsOne Hand Operable Features And Accessible Tools While ClosedIncludes Pocket Clip For Easy Carry
Versatile Set Of 17 Integrated Tools Covering Many NeedsComfortable Handles And Outside Accessible ToolsStrong And Precise Pliers And Wire CuttersLocking Mechanisms On Outside Tools For Safety
Common complaints
Relatively Heavy Compared To Standard MultitoolsHigher Price Point Due To Specialized FeaturesSome Tools May Be Overkill For Casual Users
Blade Steel Is Basic 420hc With Average Edge RetentionScissors On 2004 Model Changed To Smaller Design That Some Users Find Less SafeHeavier Than Some Other EDC Options
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online