← Back

Comparison Console

Leatherman Wave (2004) vs SOG Baton Q3

EDC Multitools comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative. SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative. Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 22% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 28% gap from the closest alternative.

Fewest tools

SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the fewest tools option for tool count, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Most tools

Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the most tools option for tool count, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Leatherman Wave (2004) stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 39% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

SOG Baton Q3 stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 65% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Leatherman Wave (2004) — Tool count: 17Leatherman Wave (2004) — Closed length: 102 mm (4.02 in)Leatherman Wave (2004) — Weight: 224 g (7.90 oz)Leatherman Wave (2004) — Retail price: US$130Leatherman Wave (2004) — Thickness: 20 mm (0.79 in)Leatherman Wave (2004) — Width: 36 mm (1.42 in)SOG Baton Q3 — Tool count: 13SOG Baton Q3 — Closed length: 168 mm (6.61 in)SOG Baton Q3 — Weight: 175 g (6.17 oz)SOG Baton Q3 — Retail price: US$94SOG Baton Q3 — Thickness: 19 mm (0.75 in)SOG Baton Q3 — Width: 16 mm (0.63 in)Tool countClosed lengthWeightRetail priceThicknessWidth
Price & carry
Retail price
US$130Most expensive
US$94Cheapest
Weight
224 g (7.90 oz)Heaviest
175 g (6.17 oz)Lightest
Closed length
102 mm (4.02 in)Shortest
168 mm (6.61 in)Longest
Open length
158 mm (6.22 in)
Unknown
Dimensions
Width
36 mm (1.42 in)Widest
16 mm (0.63 in)Narrowest
Thickness
20 mm (0.79 in)Thickest
19 mm (0.75 in)Thinnest
Tools
Tool count
17Most tools
13Fewest tools
Tools
•Pliers With Wire Cutters (needlenose & Regular)•Wire Cutters•Large Locking Blade•Serrated Blade•Wood Saw•Metal Saw•File With Diamond File•Can Opener•Bottle Opener•Scissors•Bit Driver•Small Bit Driver•Medium Screwdriver•Phillips Screwdriver•Hard Wire Cutter•Wire Stripper•Spring Action Scissors
•Awl•Bottle Opener•File•Knife•Pliers•Screwdriver•Small Screwdriver•Tin Opener•Wire Cutter•Ruler•Metal File•Needlenose Pliers•Philips Driver
Plier type
Needle-nose and Regular Pliers
Needle nose pliers
One-hand opening
Yes
No
Pocket clip
Unknown
Yes
Sheath included
Yes
No
Use case profile
Best for
▣Tradespersons▣Everyday Carry With Strong Tool Versatility▣Outdoor And Farm Use
▣Everyday Carry▣Basic Wilderness And Urban Essentials▣Urban Emergency Situations
Common praise
✓Versatile Set Of 17 Integrated Tools Covering Many Needs✓Comfortable Handles And Outside Accessible Tools✓Strong And Precise Pliers And Wire Cutters✓Locking Mechanisms On Outside Tools For Safety
✓Compact And Slim Design Similar To An Ink Marker✓Varied, Useful Toolset For Different Tasks✓Quality Aluminum Handle✓Durable Build With Lifetime Warranty
Common complaints
⚠Blade Steel Is Basic 420hc With Average Edge Retention⚠Scissors On 2004 Model Changed To Smaller Design That Some Users Find Less Safe⚠Heavier Than Some Other EDC Options
⚠Cannot Be Opened With One Hand⚠May Lack Tools For Very Heavy Duty Tasks

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online