Comparison Console
Aer Slim Pouch 2 vs Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra
EDC Pouches comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative. Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 61% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 11% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 12% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra stands out as the lowest option for pocket compartments, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the highest option for pocket compartments, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 Ultra stands out as the lowest option for slip pockets, with about a 33% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the highest option for slip pockets, with about a 50% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$49Cheapest
US$79Most expensive
Weight
168 g (5.93 oz)Heaviest
149.6857 g (5.28 oz)Lightest
Capacity
1.5 L
1.5 L
Dimensions
Height
130 mm (5.12 in)
130 mm (5.12 in)
Width
230 mm (9.06 in)
230 mm (9.06 in)
Depth
50 mm (1.97 in)
50 mm (1.97 in)
Maximum expanded depth
Unknown
Unknown
Organization
Elastic loops
0
0
Elastic loop sizes
Unknown
Unknown
Small elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Medium elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Large elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Pocket compartments
9Highest
6Lowest
Slip pockets
6Most pockets
4Fewest pockets
Zippered mesh pockets
1
1
Dividers
2Highest
1Lowest
Opening type
Clamshell
Clamshell
Materials & closure
Primary shell material
1680D CORDURA® ballistic nylon exterior (bluesign® approved)
Ultra400X exterior by Challenge Sailcloth
Water resistance
Water-resistant
Waterproof
Zipper system
YKK® zippers
YKK waterproof zippers
Mounting & carry
MOLLE/PALS compatible
No
No
MOLLE/PALS rows
Unknown
Unknown
Loop panel height
Unknown
Unknown
Loop panel width
Unknown
Unknown
Carry interfaces
Quick Grab Loop For Carrying Or HangingSide Loops For AttachmentFront Zippered Pocket
Quick Grab Loop For Carrying Or Hanging
Use case profile
Best for
Minimal Tech CarryDesk And Travel SetupsClean Organization Fans
Minimal Tech CarryDesk OrganizationTravel Use
Not best for
People Who Want Many PocketsFully Waterproof NeedsOverbuilt Pouch Lovers
Bulkier GearMulti Day TripsHeavy Packers
Common praise
Stands Upright EasilyDurable 1680d Cordura Ballistic Nylon ExteriorSmart And Practical Internal OrganizationGood Size For Essential Tech CarryLightweight For Everyday Use
Stands Upright EasilyExcellent Build QualityBalanced Internal LayoutLightweight At Around 150 Grams
Common complaints
Some Internal Slip Pockets Don't Hold Slimmer Items TightlyLimited Capacity For Bulkier GearNot Fully WaterproofZippers Can Be JanglyFront Zip Pocket Smaller Due To Zipper Placement
Limited Pockets For Bulkier GearFront Pocket Size Reduced By Zipper PlacementInterior Slip Pockets Not Very Tight
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online