Comparison Console
Aer Slim Pouch 2 vs Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra
EDC Pouches comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.
Command Brief
Recommended read
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative. Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Decision Signals
What stands out
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 61% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the lowest option for capacity, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra stands out as the highest option for capacity, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Slim Pouch 2 stands out as the lowest option for height, with about a 43% gap from the closest alternative.
Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra stands out as the highest option for height, with about a 77% gap from the closest alternative.
Specification Profile
Relative dimensions at a glance
Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.
Price & carry
Retail price
US$49Cheapest
US$79Most expensive
Weight
168 g (5.93 oz)Lightest
226.8 g (8.00 oz)Heaviest
Capacity
1.5 LLowest capacity
2.5 LLargest capacity
Dimensions
Height
130 mm (5.12 in)Shortest
230 mm (9.06 in)Tallest
Width
230 mm (9.06 in)Widest
165 mm (6.50 in)Narrowest
Depth
50 mm (1.97 in)Shallowest
75 mm (2.95 in)Deepest
Maximum expanded depth
Unknown
Unknown
Organization
Elastic loops
0Fewest loops
4Most loops
Elastic loop sizes
Unknown
Unknown
Small elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Medium elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Large elastic loops
Unknown
Unknown
Pocket compartments
9Highest
5Lowest
Slip pockets
6
Unknown
Zippered mesh pockets
1
1
Dividers
2Highest
1Lowest
Opening type
Clamshell
Clamshell
Materials & closure
Primary shell material
1680D CORDURA® ballistic nylon exterior (bluesign® approved)
Ultra400X exterior by Challenge Sailcloth
Water resistance
Water-resistant
Water-resistant fabric
Zipper system
YKK® zippers
YKK® zippers
Mounting & carry
MOLLE/PALS compatible
No
No
MOLLE/PALS rows
Unknown
Unknown
Loop panel height
Unknown
Unknown
Loop panel width
Unknown
Unknown
Carry interfaces
Quick Grab Loop For Carrying Or HangingSide Loops For AttachmentFront Zippered Pocket
Stow Away Ykk® Hook For HangingConvenient Carry Handle
Use case profile
Best for
Minimal Tech CarryDesk And Travel SetupsClean Organization Fans
Organizing Travel ToiletriesTravel Toiletry StorageHanging Toiletry Organization
Not best for
People Who Want Many PocketsFully Waterproof NeedsOverbuilt Pouch Lovers
Unknown
Common praise
Stands Upright EasilyDurable 1680d Cordura Ballistic Nylon ExteriorSmart And Practical Internal OrganizationGood Size For Essential Tech CarryLightweight For Everyday Use
Durable And Water Resistant MaterialsSmart Hanging Hook DesignAmple Pockets Including Exterior Toothbrush HoldersWell Organized Elastic Loops For Toiletries
Common complaints
Some Internal Slip Pockets Don't Hold Slimmer Items TightlyLimited Capacity For Bulkier GearNot Fully WaterproofZippers Can Be JanglyFront Zip Pocket Smaller Due To Zipper Placement
Elastic Loops Less Secure For Very Small BottlesBag Tends To Spin Freely On Hooked HangingWider Size Less Compact Than Previous Version
Dataset Expansion
Missing a brand?
Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.
Community indexing queue online