← Back

Comparison Console

Fenix LR35R vs Fenix TK20R V2.0

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative. Fenix LR35R stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 233% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Fenix LR35R stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Fenix LR35R stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 70% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Fenix LR35R stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 233% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Fenix TK20R V2.0 stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Fenix LR35R stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Fenix LR35R — Beam distance: 500 m (1640 ft)Fenix LR35R — Weight: 239 g (8.43 oz)Fenix LR35R — Length: 140 mm (5.51 in)Fenix LR35R — Retail price: US$200Fenix LR35R — Max lumens: 10000 lmFenix LR35R — Max runtime: 4800 minFenix TK20R V2.0 — Beam distance: 475 m (1558 ft)Fenix TK20R V2.0 — Weight: 204 g (7.20 oz)Fenix TK20R V2.0 — Length: 153 mm (6.02 in)Fenix TK20R V2.0 — Retail price: US$130Fenix TK20R V2.0 — Max lumens: 3000 lmFenix TK20R V2.0 — Max runtime: 2880 minBeam distanceWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumensMax runtime
Price & carry
Retail price
US$200Most expensive
US$130Cheapest
Weight
239 g (8.43 oz)Heaviest
204 g (7.20 oz)Lightest
Length
140 mm (5.51 in)Shortest
153 mm (6.02 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
10000 lmHighest output
3000 lmLowest output
Max candela
Unknown
56600 cd
Beam distance
500 m (1640 ft)Highest
475 m (1558 ft)Lowest
Max runtime
4800 minLongest runtime
2880 minShortest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
Two 21700 rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (4000 mAh each)
21700 Li-ion rechargeable
Charging type
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IP68
IP68
Impact resistance
1 m (3 ft)
Unknown
Material
Unknown
Unknown
Use case profile
Best for
Outdoor adventuresHikingCampingHigh brightness needs
Tactical identification and useLaw enforcementMilitarySearch and RescueOutdoor professionals
Common praise
Very bright with multiple output levelsLong runtime and rechargeable batteriesRobust and durable designBattery level indicator on switch
Very high 3000 lumen output with excellent 475m beam throw for tactical useConvenient USB-C rechargeable 21700 battery system with solid runtimeIntuitive dual tailcap switches for one-handed tactical operationRugged IP68 waterproof and impact-resistant designVersatile multi-mode output including instant strobe for defensive purposes
Common complaints
Relatively heavy for pocket carryLarger size compared to typical EDC flashlights
Larger and heavier than compact EDC lights (204g with battery)No ultra-low moonlight mode for extended low-light preservationTurbo mode step-down under sustained usePremium pricing compared to basic tactical lightsMade in China may be a consideration for some U.S. procurement preferences