← Back

Comparison Console

Olight Arkfeld UV vs Olight Baton 4 Pro

EDC Flashlights comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Olight Arkfeld UV stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative. Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Olight Arkfeld UV stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Olight Arkfeld UV stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 24% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 31% gap from the closest alternative.

Lowest output

Olight Arkfeld UV stands out as the lowest output option for max lumens, with about a 38% gap from the closest alternative.

Highest output

Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the highest output option for max lumens, with about a 60% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest runtime

Olight Arkfeld UV stands out as the shortest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 100% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest runtime

Olight Baton 4 Pro stands out as the longest runtime option for max runtime, with about a 1252074% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Olight Arkfeld UV — Beam distance: 85 m (279 ft)Olight Arkfeld UV — Max candela: 1808 cdOlight Arkfeld UV — Weight: 87 g (3.07 oz)Olight Arkfeld UV — Length: 110 mm (4.33 in)Olight Arkfeld UV — Retail price: US$79.99Olight Arkfeld UV — Max lumens: 1000 lmOlight Baton 4 Pro — Beam distance: 200 m (656 ft)Olight Baton 4 Pro — Max candela: 10158 cdOlight Baton 4 Pro — Weight: 114 g (4.02 oz)Olight Baton 4 Pro — Length: 111 mm (4.37 in)Olight Baton 4 Pro — Retail price: US$69.99Olight Baton 4 Pro — Max lumens: 1600 lmBeam distanceMax candelaWeightLengthRetail priceMax lumens
Price & carry
Retail price
US$79.99Most expensive
US$69.99Cheapest
Weight
87 g (3.07 oz)Lightest
114 g (4.02 oz)Heaviest
Length
110 mm (4.33 in)Shortest
111 mm (4.37 in)Longest
Output
Max lumens
1000 lmLowest output
1600 lmHighest output
Max candela
1808 cdLowest candela
10158 cdHighest candela
Beam distance
85 m (279 ft)Lowest
200 m (656 ft)Highest
Max runtime
115 minShortest runtime
1440000 minLongest runtime
Power & durability
Battery type
Built-in rechargeable battery
1 x 18650 rechargeable battery (3500mAh included)
Charging type
Proprietary magnetic charging cable
USB-C port and magnetic MCC charging
Rechargeable
Yes
Yes
IP rating
IPX7
IPX8
Impact resistance
Unknown
Unknown
Material
Anodized aluminum
6061 Aluminum Alloy
Use case profile
Best for
EDCUV light utilityMultipurpose usePocket carryWaterproof use
EDC useProfessional daily carryOutdoor activitiesCampingEmergency preparedness
Common praise
Compact and pocketable flat designHigh max output of 1000 lumensVersatile UV light functionFive brightness modes plus strobe and UVIPX7 waterproof ratingQuick 2-hour recharge timeLightweight at approximately 87 gramsGood build quality with anodized aluminum and anti-slip texturingUseful clip for secure pocket carry
High brightness output for its sizeVersatile dual switch interfaceLong runtime especially in Moonlight modeConvenient dual charging options (USB-C and magnetic)Good build quality and grip
Common complaints
Short runtime at max 1000 lumens (approx 4-110 minutes)Switching between UV and white light can be awkwardNo specified impact resistance rating
No explicit complaints mentioned in sources