← Back

Comparison Console

CRKT Crossbones vs CRKT Razelcliffe Compact

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

CRKT Crossbones stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative. CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

CRKT Crossbones stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 56% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

CRKT Crossbones stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 27% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 36% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 40% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Crossbones stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 67% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

CRKT Razelcliffe Compact stands out as the shortest option for overall length, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

CRKT Crossbones stands out as the longest option for overall length, with about a 54% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

CRKT Crossbones — Blade length: 90 mm (3.54 in)CRKT Crossbones — Overall length: 205 mm (8.07 in)CRKT Crossbones — Blade thickness: 3.15 mm (0.12 in)CRKT Crossbones — Weight: 68 g (2.40 oz)CRKT Crossbones — Retail price: US$70CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade length: 54.05 mm (2.13 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Overall length: 133.35 mm (5.25 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Blade thickness: 2.79 mm (0.11 in)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Weight: 92.68 g (3.27 oz)CRKT Razelcliffe Compact — Retail price: US$45Blade lengthOverall lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$70Most expensive
US$45Cheapest
Weight
68 g (2.40 oz)Lightest
92.68 g (3.27 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
90 mm (3.54 in)Longest
54.05 mm (2.13 in)Shortest
Overall length
205 mm (8.07 in)Longest
133.35 mm (5.25 in)Shortest
Closed length
114 mm (4.49 in)
Unknown
Blade thickness
3.15 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.79 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
AUS-8
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Aluminum
Stainless Steel
Finish
Satin
Black Stonewash
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame Lock
Opening method
Flipper
Flipper
Clip type
Right hand only, tip up
Stainless Steel pocket clip (Right - Tip Up)
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryCutting meatOpening envelopesGeneral utility
Everyday Carry
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Versatile everyday carry knifeSmooth and fast opening with IKBS bearing pivotSleek and modern appearanceLightweight and slim design
Compact sizeSolid feel in-handGood grip due to deep finger choil and thumb friction groovesVersatile for slicing, shaving, chopping, and paring
Common complaints
Can be tricky to clean due to IKBS bearingsTip ergonomics not the easiest for some usesLockup and deployment mixed under some conditions
Unknown

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online