← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Clash vs Kershaw Filter

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Kershaw Clash stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 13% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Kershaw Clash stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 14% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 15% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 17% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 6% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Filter stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Clash — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Clash — Overall length: 190 mm (7.48 in)Kershaw Clash — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Clash — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Kershaw Clash — Weight: 122 g (4.30 oz)Kershaw Clash — Retail price: US$48Kershaw Filter — Blade length: 83 mm (3.27 in)Kershaw Filter — Overall length: 197 mm (7.76 in)Kershaw Filter — Closed length: 114 mm (4.49 in)Kershaw Filter — Blade thickness: 2.7 mm (0.11 in)Kershaw Filter — Weight: 143 g (5.04 oz)Kershaw Filter — Retail price: US$41.99Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthBlade thicknessWeightRetail price
Price & carry
Retail price
US$48Most expensive
US$41.99Cheapest
Weight
122 g (4.30 oz)Lightest
143 g (5.04 oz)Heaviest
Dimensions
Blade length
79 mm (3.11 in)Shortest
83 mm (3.27 in)Longest
Overall length
190 mm (7.48 in)Shortest
197 mm (7.76 in)Longest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Shortest
114 mm (4.49 in)Longest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)Thickest
2.7 mm (0.11 in)Thinnest
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
4Cr14 stainless steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
Stainless steel
Finish
Black-oxide coating on blade
Black-Oxide BlackWash coating on blade and handle
Lock type
Liner Lock
Frame lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Assisted opening with flipper and thumb stud
Clip type
Reversible pocketclip (right, tip-up/down)
Single-position deep-carry pocketclip, right side, tip-down
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryUtility tasksLight outdoor use
Everyday carryWork
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good edge holdingComfortable gripVersatile partial serrationsAffordableReliable assisted opening
Well-balanced and solid frame lock actionComfortable stainless steel handle with smooth contouringProtective BlackWash coating hides wear and resists scratchesFast and easy one-handed assisted opening via flipper and thumb stud
Common complaints
Unknown
None clearly documented in provided sources

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online