← Back

Comparison Console

Kershaw Clash vs Spyderco Efficient

EDC Knives comparison. Compare price, weight, specifications, materials, and real-world use case.

Add gear
Command Brief

Recommended read

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative. Kershaw Clash stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Decision Signals

What stands out

Cheapest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the cheapest option for retail price, with about a 26% gap from the closest alternative.

Most expensive

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the most expensive option for retail price, with about a 35% gap from the closest alternative.

Lightest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the lightest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Heaviest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the heaviest option for weight, with about a 5% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the longest option for closed length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Shortest

Spyderco Efficient stands out as the shortest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Longest

Kershaw Clash stands out as the longest option for blade length, with about a 4% gap from the closest alternative.

Specification Profile

Relative dimensions at a glance

Each axis is normalized against the largest raw value among the products in this comparison. Farther outward means a larger value, not necessarily a better result. Axes with an unverified value are omitted.

Kershaw Clash — Blade length: 79 mm (3.11 in)Kershaw Clash — Overall length: 190 mm (7.48 in)Kershaw Clash — Closed length: 108 mm (4.25 in)Kershaw Clash — Weight: 122 g (4.30 oz)Kershaw Clash — Retail price: US$48Kershaw Clash — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Spyderco Efficient — Blade length: 76 mm (2.99 in)Spyderco Efficient — Overall length: 180 mm (7.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Closed length: 104 mm (4.09 in)Spyderco Efficient — Weight: 116 g (4.09 oz)Spyderco Efficient — Retail price: US$65Spyderco Efficient — Blade thickness: 3 mm (0.12 in)Blade lengthOverall lengthClosed lengthWeightRetail priceBlade thickness
Price & carry
Retail price
US$48Cheapest
US$65Most expensive
Weight
122 g (4.30 oz)Heaviest
116 g (4.09 oz)Lightest
Dimensions
Blade length
79 mm (3.11 in)Longest
76 mm (2.99 in)Shortest
Overall length
190 mm (7.48 in)Longest
180 mm (7.09 in)Shortest
Closed length
108 mm (4.25 in)Longest
104 mm (4.09 in)Shortest
Blade thickness
3 mm (0.12 in)
3 mm (0.12 in)
Materials & mechanism
Blade steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
8Cr13MoV Stainless Steel
Handle material
Glass-filled nylon
G-10 Laminate
Finish
Black-oxide coating on blade
Satin or Black oxide coated blade
Lock type
Liner Lock
Liner Lock
Opening method
SpeedSafe assisted opening with flipper
Spyderco Trademark Round Hole for one-handed opening
Clip type
Reversible pocketclip (right, tip-up/down)
Reversible hourglass clip, ambidextrous tip-up carry
Use case profile
Best for
Everyday carryUtility tasksLight outdoor use
Everyday carryTactical useValue-oriented users
Not best for
Unknown
Unknown
Common praise
Good edge holdingComfortable gripVersatile partial serrationsAffordableReliable assisted opening
Good value for the priceSolid build quality for a budget bladeComfortable ergonomic handleEffective and secure liner lock mechanismReversible clip for versatile carry options
Common complaints
Unknown
Blade steel is lower-end (8Cr13MoV) compared to high-end knives

Dataset Expansion

Missing a brand?

Suggest an EDC brand for CarryCrew to research and add to the comparison database.

Community indexing queue online